Which of the following scenarios would NOT require informed consent according to NASP ethics?

Consulting with a teacher regarding student needs typically does not require informed consent because this type of consultation is considered part of the typical collaborative practices in educational environments. When school psychologists collaborate with teachers, their discussions often focus on strategies, interventions, or general observations related to student performance, which is generally understood to be within the scope of their professional roles.

Informed consent is more critical in situations where identifiable, sensitive, or individualizing interventions take place, such as conducting assessments, administering psychological tests, or providing therapy, particularly to minors. In these contexts, obtaining informed consent ensures that individuals understand the nature, purpose, and potential risks of the procedures involved, which fosters ethical practices and protects student welfare. Thus, the nature of routine consultations like the one with a teacher regarding a student’s needs does not necessitate this formalized consent process, making it the scenario that does not require informed consent according to NASP ethics.