Should a school psychologist bypass student assent if it is thought the service is a direct benefit?

Bypassing student assent is a complex issue that typically hinges on ethical considerations around consent and the rights of students. The correct course of action in this scenario generally emphasizes the importance of obtaining student assent, even if a psychologist believes that the service could directly benefit the student.

The rationale against bypassing assent lies in the ethical principle of respect for the student's autonomy. When psychologists work with students, it is essential to involve them in the decision-making process to acknowledge their rights and promote their agency. Even if an intervention is anticipated to be beneficial, without the student's agreement, it may undermine their trust in the psychologist, the school, and the broader educational environment.

In most situations, student assent should not be overlooked since it reflects a respect for the emerging autonomy and self-direction of the student, which is particularly pertinent in school settings. Therefore, even if a psychologist believes that bypassing assent may lead to beneficial outcomes, they should ideally engage with the student to explain the purpose and expected benefits of the intervention, allowing for a more collaborative approach to support and care.