As a future school psychologist, is it ethically acceptable to bypass a child’s assent to services if the service is considered beneficial?

The correct answer emphasizes that it is ethically acceptable to bypass a child's assent to services if there is a legal requirement to do so. In the practice of school psychology, consent and assent are significant ethical considerations, as they respect the autonomy and agency of the child. However, in specific legal contexts, there may be regulations that mandate certain interventions or services regardless of a child's assent—particularly if these services are aimed at protecting the child or addressing significant needs.

In situations where laws dictate that certain actions must be taken—such as mandatory reporting or specific mental health interventions—school psychologists might be required to act in accordance with the law, even if the child does not provide assent. This framework ensures that the welfare and safety of the child remain paramount, which aligns with ethical practice standards.

Obtaining assent from a child is important for fostering collaboration and trust, but in circumstances where legal obligations are present, prioritizing those legal requirements may sometimes take precedence in the decision-making process. Thus, the response underlines both ethical considerations and the necessity of adhering to established laws in the provision of services.